Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q [2017/04/26 18:08] joy.cho [Benchmark of ODROID-XU4 with Active Cooler and Passive Cooler (XU4Q)] |
en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q [2017/04/27 12:56] (current) john1117 [Benchmark of XU4 with Active Cooler and XU4Q with Passive Cooler] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Benchmark of ODROID-XU4 with Active Cooler and Passive Cooler (XU4Q) ====== | + | ====== Benchmark of XU4 with Active Cooler and XU4Q with Passive Cooler ====== |
| This wiki page shows benchmark test results to analysis and compare their system performance\\ | This wiki page shows benchmark test results to analysis and compare their system performance\\ | ||
| with ODROID-XU4 and ODROID-XU4Q that equips with a passive cooler.\\ | with ODROID-XU4 and ODROID-XU4Q that equips with a passive cooler.\\ | ||
| + | {{:en:201704250351126731.jpg?423|}} | ||
| * [[en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#benchmark_1_-_thermal_and_performance_using_sysbench| 1. Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison]] | * [[en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#benchmark_1_-_thermal_and_performance_using_sysbench| 1. Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison]] | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| We've tested three categories of benchmarking utilities and here is a brief result for each test cases.\\ | We've tested three categories of benchmarking utilities and here is a brief result for each test cases.\\ | ||
| - | Except the hardest case like kernel build, the differences are under just 10% or lower.\\ | ||
| **sysbench**\\ | **sysbench**\\ | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
| **AnTuTu**\\ | **AnTuTu**\\ | ||
| - for examining a variety of categories performance\\ | - for examining a variety of categories performance\\ | ||
| - | - The decreasing score value of XU4Q from XU is just 2% \\ | + | - The decreasing score value of XU4Q from XU4 is just 2% \\ |
| **Kernel build**\\ | **Kernel build**\\ | ||
| - to check the hardest stress case\\ | - to check the hardest stress case\\ | ||
| - | - About 5m 17s increase of the total execution time (20%) | + | - About 5m 17s increase of the total execution time (20%)\\ |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Except the hardest case like kernel build, the differences are under just 10% or lower.\\ | ||
| ==== [ Benchmark (1) - Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison ]==== | ==== [ Benchmark (1) - Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison ]==== | ||
| Line 103: | Line 106: | ||
| {{:en:screen-xu4q_1.png?direct&600|}}\\ | {{:en:screen-xu4q_1.png?direct&600|}}\\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | === Conclusion === | + | === Detail score === |
| ^ Category ^ XU4 ^ XU4Q ^ % ^ | ^ Category ^ XU4 ^ XU4Q ^ % ^ | ||
| | 3D | 9823 | 9843.5 | 0.21 | | | 3D | 9823 | 9843.5 | 0.21 | | ||
