We're no longer updating This wiki!!

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q [2017/04/26 18:05]
joy.cho [Benchmark of ODROID-XU4 with Active Cooler and Passive Cooler (XU4Q)]
en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q [2017/04/27 12:56] (current)
john1117 [Benchmark of XU4 with Active Cooler and XU4Q with Passive Cooler]
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Benchmark of ODROID-XU4 with Active Cooler and Passive Cooler ​(XU4Q) ​====== +====== Benchmark of XU4 with Active Cooler and XU4Q with Passive Cooler ======
 This wiki page shows benchmark test results to analysis and compare their system performance\\ This wiki page shows benchmark test results to analysis and compare their system performance\\
 with ODROID-XU4 and ODROID-XU4Q that equips with a passive cooler.\\ with ODROID-XU4 and ODROID-XU4Q that equips with a passive cooler.\\
  
 +{{:​en:​201704250351126731.jpg?​423|}}
  
   * [[en:​xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#​benchmark_1_-_thermal_and_performance_using_sysbench| 1. Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison]]   * [[en:​xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#​benchmark_1_-_thermal_and_performance_using_sysbench| 1. Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison]]
Line 9: Line 9:
   * [[en:​xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#​benchmark_3_-_kernel_build_time| 3. Kernel Build Time Performance Comparison]]   * [[en:​xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#​benchmark_3_-_kernel_build_time| 3. Kernel Build Time Performance Comparison]]
  
-We've tested three categories of benchmarking utilities.\\ +We've tested three categories of benchmarking utilities ​and here is a brief result for each test cases.\\
-And here is a brief result for each test cases.\\+
  
 **sysbench**\\ **sysbench**\\
 - to investigate and compare thermal/cpu frequency performance\\ - to investigate and compare thermal/cpu frequency performance\\
 - Sysbench running time increased by 16% and 6% for each cases of cpu max 2GHz and 1.8GHz\\ - Sysbench running time increased by 16% and 6% for each cases of cpu max 2GHz and 1.8GHz\\
- 
 **AnTuTu**\\ **AnTuTu**\\
 - for examining a variety of categories performance\\ - for examining a variety of categories performance\\
-- The decreasing score value of XU4Q from XU is just 2% \\ +- The decreasing score value of XU4Q from XU4 is just 2% \\
 **Kernel build**\\ **Kernel build**\\
 - to check the hardest stress case\\ - to check the hardest stress case\\
-- About 5m 17s increase of the total execution time (20%)+- About 5m 17s increase of the total execution time (20%)\\ 
 + 
 + 
 +Except the hardest case like kernel build, the differences are under just 10% or lower.\\ 
 ==== [ Benchmark (1) - Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison ]==== ==== [ Benchmark (1) - Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison ]====
  
Line 105: Line 106:
 {{:​en:​screen-xu4q_1.png?​direct&​600|}}\\ {{:​en:​screen-xu4q_1.png?​direct&​600|}}\\
 \\ \\
-=== Conclusion ​===+=== Detail score ===
 ^ Category ​        ​^ ​ XU4      ^  XU4Q     ​^ ​     % ^ ^ Category ​        ​^ ​ XU4      ^  XU4Q     ​^ ​     % ^
 | 3D               ​| ​ 9823     ​| ​ 9843.5 ​  ​| ​  0.21 | | 3D               ​| ​ 9823     ​| ​ 9843.5 ​  ​| ​  0.21 |
en/xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q.1493199324.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/04/26 18:05 by joy.cho
CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0