Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q [2017/04/26 17:32]
joy.cho [[ Benchmark (2) - Android AnTuTu ]]
+++ en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q [2017/04/27 12:56] (current)
john1117 [Benchmark of XU4 with Active Cooler and XU4Q with Passive Cooler]
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Benchmark of ODROID-XU4 with Active Cooler and Passive Cooler (XU4Q) ======
+====== Benchmark of XU4 with Active Cooler and XU4Q with Passive Cooler ======
 This wiki page shows benchmark test results to analysis and compare their system performance\\
 with ODROID-XU4 and ODROID-XU4Q that equips with a passive cooler.\\
+{{:en:201704250351126731.jpg?423|}}
   * [[en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#benchmark_1_-_thermal_and_performance_using_sysbench| 1. Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison]]
   * [[en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#benchmark_2_-_android_antutu | 2. AnTuTu Performance Comparison ]]
   * [[en:xu4_benchmark_xu4_xu4q&#benchmark_3_-_kernel_build_time| 3. Kernel Build Time Performance Comparison]]
+We've tested three categories of benchmarking utilities and here is a brief result for each test cases.\\
+**sysbench**\\
+- to investigate and compare thermal/cpu frequency performance\\
+- Sysbench running time increased by 16% and 6% for each cases of cpu max 2GHz and 1.8GHz\\
+**AnTuTu**\\
+- for examining a variety of categories performance\\
+- The decreasing score value of XU4Q from XU4 is just 2% \\
+**Kernel build**\\
+- to check the hardest stress case\\
+- About 5m 17s increase of the total execution time (20%)\\
+Except the hardest case like kernel build, the differences are under just 10% or lower.\\
 ==== [ Benchmark (1) - Thermal and Frequency Performance Comparison ]====
@@ Line 59: / Line 75: @@
 Here is sysbench test result in case of max cpu frequency 2.0GHz.\\
-  * Running Time : about 1.16% increase - XU4Q / XU4 = 420 / 362 = 1.16%
+  * Running Time : about 16% increase - XU4Q / XU4 = 420 / 362 = **116%**
-  * Average CPU Frequency : about 0.78% loss - XU4Q / XU4 = 1.48 / 1.89 = 0.78%
+  * Average CPU Frequency : about 22% loss - XU4Q / XU4 = 1.48 / 1.89 = **78%**
-{{:en:1_xu4_max_2ghz.png?700}}
+{{:en:1_xu4_max_2ghz.png?700}}{{:en:2_xu4q_max_2ghz.png?700}}
-{{:en:2_xu4q_max_2ghz.png?700}}
 === Test Case 2 - Max CPU Frequency 1.8GHz case ===
-  * Running Time : about 1.06% increase - XU4Q / XU4 = 392  / 368 = 1.06%
+  * Running Time : about 6% increase - XU4Q / XU4 = 392  / 368 = **106%**
-  * Average CPU Frequency : about 0.89% loss - XU4Q / XU4 = 1.61 / 1.8 = 0.89%
+  * Average CPU Frequency : about 11% loss - XU4Q / XU4 = 1.61 / 1.8 = **89%**
-{{:en:3_xu4_max_1_8ghz.png?700}}
+{{:en:3_xu4_max_1_8ghz.png?700}}{{:en:4_xu4q_max_1_8ghz.png?700}}
-{{:en:4_xu4q_max_1_8ghz.png?700}}
 === Test Case 3 - Finding the threshold not to drop under max frequency ===
@@ Line 92: / Line 106: @@
 {{:en:screen-xu4q_1.png?direct&600|}}\\
 \\
-=== Conclusion ===
+=== Detail score ===
 ^ Category         ^  XU4      ^  XU4Q     ^      % ^
 | 3D               |  9823     |  9843.5   |   0.21 |
@@ Line 128: / Line 142: @@
 </code>
-Based on the result, in this case, XU4Q built time gets **around 20%** increase.
+Based on the result, in this case, the kernel build time on XU4Q gets **around 20%** increase from XU4's one.
 ^  time   ^  XU4  ^  XU4Q  ^